The Swedish response to this pandemic was unique and characterised by a morally, ethically, and scientifically questionable laissez-faire approach, a consequence of structural problems in the society. There was more emphasis on the protection of the “Swedish image” than on saving and protecting lives or on an evidence-based approach. A strategy was never discussed among all relevant parties, and never implemented nor communicated to the public. In addition, there was an unwillingness and incapacity to admit any failures at all governmental levels; or to take any responsibility for the clearly detrimental outcomes for Swedish society. There were even attempts to revise history by changing, or deleting official documents, communication, and websites, and gaslighting the public. The Swedish authorities involved were not self-critical and did not engage in any official and open dialogue and misled the public by withholding correct information and even spreading misleading information. A small group of so-called experts with a narrow disciplinary focus received a disproportionate and unquestioned amount of power in the discussion, nationally and internationally. There was no intellectual/scientific discussion between stakeholders (including independent experts from different disciplines), and the international advice of WHO, ECDC and the scientific community was ignored and/or discredited.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01097-5

The Open Observatory of Network Interference (OONI) is a global community measuring internet censorship around the world. Run OONI Probe to detect internet censorship. Use OONI Explorer to track internet censorship worldwide in near real-time.

Pour ton esprit, ta planète, ta culture et ta vie privée, bloque la pub sur Internet.
Et pour ceux de tes copin·es, passe le bloqueur à tes voisin·es.